Image Quality and Dose Dependence on X-ray Exposure Factors

Authors

  • Akaagerger N. B. Department of Physics, Benue State University, Makurdi, Benue State
  • Injoalu T.F Department of Physics, Benue State University, Makurdi, Benue State
  • Agbah E. H Department of Physics, Benue State University, Makurdi, Benue State

Keywords:

X-ray, Film, Image, Quality, Exposure, Factors

Abstract

In this study, the investigation of image quality and dose dependence on diagnostic X-ray exposure factors was conducted using kVp multi-meter, Edmond’s formula and densitometer. A total of 100 patients were exposed to diagnostic X-ray during their routine chest X-ray examinations. The exposure factors of kilovolt (kVp) and tube current time (mAs) that produced optimal doses and optical density associated with X-ray films obtained from three Hospitals labelled HSP1, HSP2 and HSP3 showed the mean exposure factors of 55 kVp and 5.4 mAs with 0.72 optical density; 67 kVp and 34 mAs with 0.94 optical density; 62 kVp and 16 mAs with 0.75 optical density respectively. The fourth hospital labelled HSP4 showed the mean exposure factors of 73 kVp and 3.5 mAs with 0.88 optical density.The kVp and mAs investigated show optical density in the range of 0.72 to 0.94 OD that produced good image quality. The measured and calculated patients dose in the Hospitals was compared with reference dose levels. This study provides guidance on where efforts on dose reduction will need to be directed to fulfil
the requirements of optimization process 

References

Agba E. H (2017). Principles of Biophysics and Medical Physics; Confidence Books

Publishers, Makurdi, Nigeria.

Agba E.H., Fiase J.O., Agada S.A. & Thomas D. (2002). Patients skin dose from diagnostic X-rays at Federal Medical Centre Markudi, Benue State. Zuma Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 4(1), 14-18.

United Nations, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation (Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes), Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), UN, New York (2000),

United Nations, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation (Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes), Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), UN, New York (1996).

Edmonds IR (1974). Calculation of Patient Skin Dose from Diagnostic X-ray Procedure. British Journal of

Radiology57, 733-734.

Dlama J., Joseph I., Samuel S., Peter E., Dlama Y., Geofrey l., Abubakar M., Kpaku G. & Gloria J. (2014),

Assessment of Entrance Skin Dose and Image Quality of Chest X-Rays in Two University Teaching Hospitals, North East Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. ISSN: 2320–1940 Vol. 3, Issue 6 Ver. II 65-75

Johnson and Brenan (2000). Reference Dose Levels is for Patients Undergoing Common Diagnostic X-rays Examination in Irish Hospitals. British Journal of Radiology73, 396 – 402.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1996). Quantities and Units in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, ICRU Rep. 51, ICRU, Bethesda, MD

Willis C.E, &Slovis T.L. (2004), The ALARA concept in paediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in paediatric radiographic exams–a white paper conference executive summary. Paediatric Radiology; 34 (Suppl. 3), 162–4.

National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) (1990): Patient Dose Reduction in Diagnostic Radiology.

Documents of the NRPB. 1(3).

Faulkner K, Jones AP & Walker A (1999): Safety in diagnostic radiology. National Radiological Protection Board Report No. 72, The institute of physical sciences in medicine, York: UK.

Hart D, Hillier M, Wall B. Doses to Patients from Medical X-Ray Examinations in the UK. NRPB ublication. 2002; 33 - 36

Wright, Julius Sim, Chris (2002). Researchin health care: concepts, designs and methods (Reprinted. Ed). Cheltenham: N. Thornes

Akpochafor M.O., Omojola A. D., Adeneye S.O., Aweda M. A. &Ajayi H. B. (2016). Determination of reference dose levels among selected x-ray centres in Lagos State, South-West

Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Sciences 13, 167-172

Bushong C. Stewart (2001). Radiologic science for technologists’ physics, biology, and protection (3rd ed.). Missouri: Mosby.

Radiological Protection of Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and

Radiotherapy IAEA, Vienna, 2001

National Radiologic Protection Board. (2000). National protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. ChiltonDidcot, UK: NRPB.

Report of the working party of the Institute of Physics Science in Medicine.

Akbar A., Ehsan M., Mahboubeh M., Morteza S., & Mehran M. (2015). Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran. Global NIGERIAN ANNALS OF PURE & APPLIED SCIENCES, VOL. 6, ISSUE 1, 2023 http://napas.org.ng

Journal of Health Science; 7 (5). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p202

Gholami M., Maziar A., khosravi H.R., Ebrahimzadeh F. &Mayahi S. (2015). Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for routine x-ray examinations in Lorestan province, Iran. International Journal of Radiation Research 13(1), 85-90

Obed R.I., Ademolaa.K., Adewoyin K. A. &Okunade O. A (2007). Dose to patients in routine x-ray examinations of chest, skull, abdomen and pelvis in nine selected hospitals in Nigeria.

Research Journal of Medical Sciences 1(4),209-214

Published

2023-09-22

How to Cite

Akaagerger, N. B., Injoalu, T., & Agba, H. (2023). Image Quality and Dose Dependence on X-ray Exposure Factors. NIGERIAN ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 6(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://mail.napas.org.ng/index.php/napas/article/view/345